Immunoexpression of human leukocyte antigen-DR in actinic cheilitis and lower lip squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunoexpression of human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) in actinic cheilitis (AC) and lower lip squamous cell carcinoma (LLSCC), and to correlate the findings with clinical (tumor size/extent, regional lymph node metastasis, and clinical stage) and histopathological (grade of epithelial dysplasia and inflammatory infiltrate for AC and histopathological grade of malignancy for LLSCC) parameters. Twenty-four AC and 48 LLSCC cases (24 with regional nodal metastasis and 24 without regional nodal metastasis) were selected. The scores of immunopositive cells for HLA-DR in the epithelial component of the lesions were assessed and the results were analyzed statistically using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Epithelial expression of HLA-DR was observed in only five (20.8%) cases of AC (two low-grade and three high-grade lesions), with a very low median score of immunopositivity. By contrast, expression of HLA-DR was found in most LLSCC (97.9%), with a relatively high median score of positive cells. The score of HLA-DR-positive cells tended to be higher in tumors with regional lymph node metastasis, tumors in advanced clinical stages, and low-grade tumors, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In addition, there was a tendency towards higher expression of HLA-DR in highly/moderately keratinized tumors, and tumors with little/moderate nuclear pleomorphism (p > 0.05). The results suggest a potential role of HLA-DR in lip carcinogenesis, particularly in the development and progression of LLSCC. The expression of this protein can be related to the degree of cell differentiation in these tumors.

Bases evolutivas y ecológicas de la carcinogénesis humana ¿cuestión de mala suerte? / Evolutionary and ecological bases of human carcinogenesis, a matter of bad luck?

El cáncer constituye un serio problema de salud a nivel mundial. Las estimaciones, en cuanto a incidencia y mortalidad, no son nada halagüeñas, en especial para los países subdesarrollados. Durante las últimas décadas se han realizado importantes contribuciones a la comprensión de la carcinogénesis humana, sobre todo desde la perspectiva ecológica y evolutiva. Los objetivos del presente trabajo se centran en: destacar las principales hipótesis que desde dicha perspectiva, tratan de explicar la etiología de los tumores malignos, así como adecuar las que, a la luz de los hallazgos recientes o cotejadas con datos empíricos, parecen más factibles. La hipótesis tradicionalmente aceptada se basa en la carcinogénesis en múltiples etapas y explica de manera satisfactoria algunos aspectos del proceso; aunque conlleva a falacias de lógica, como la conclusión que dos tercios de los cánceres humanos obedecen a la mala suerte. Por su parte, la hipótesis de la oncogénesis adaptativa parece adecuarse de manera más realística a las complejas relaciones ecológicas que se establecen entre las células malignas, las células normales y el microambiente celular; capaces de originar fenómenos tan inadmisibles, como la cooperación de células normales en la progresión tumoral o la adopción por parte de las células malignas de estrategias evolutivamente estables. De hecho, la oncogénesis adaptativa incluso puede ser extendida al nivel del macroambiente poblacional y social. Su conclusión definitiva no hace más que reiterar la importancia de la prevención como la medida más eficaz para reducir la carga global de enfermedad por cáncer(AU)

Cancer is a serious health problem worldwide. Estimates, in terms of incidence and mortality, are not at all promising especially for underdeveloped countries. During the last decades, important contributions have been made to the understanding of human carcinogenesis, especially from the ecological and evolutionary perspective. The objectives of this work are focused on: highlighting the main hypotheses that, from this perspective, try to explain the etiology of malignant tumors, as well as adapting those that, in the light of recent findings or collated with empirical data, seem more feasible. The traditionally accepted hypothesis is based on multi-stage carcinogenesis; and satisfactorily explains some aspects of the process; although it leads to logic fallacies, such as the conclusion that two thirds of human cancers obey to bad luck. On the other hand, the hypothesis of adaptive oncogenesis seems to adapt more realistically to the complex ecological relationships established between malignant cells, normal cells, and the cellular microenvironment; capable of originating such inadmissible phenomena, such as the cooperation of normal cells in tumor progression, or the adoption by malignant cells of evolutionarily stable strategies. In fact, adaptive oncogenesis can even be extended to the level of the population and social "macroenvironment". Its final conclusion does nothing but reiterate the importance of prevention as the most effective measure to reduce the global burden of cancer disease(AU)